The report has been issues compiling the starting year's worth of security vulnerability found in Windows Vista comparing with Windows XP.
Here are a few highlights :
Metric | Windows Vista (year 1) | Windows XP (year 1) |
Vulnerabilities fixed | 36 | 65 |
Security Updates | 17 | 30 |
Patch Events | 9 | 26 |
Weeks with at least 1 Patch Event | 9 | 25 |
These figures may be interesting until you include a cost saving implications of reduced patches. According to a customer, each patch has cost him £30K, so reduction in patches would have delivered a direct £480,000 this year saving to him running Windows Vista over Windows XP. Then there is the incalculable reduction in corporate risk from this reduction in vulnerabilities.
Continue at Technet Blogs
1 comment:
As far as cost is concerned, Vista comes to limelight but the problem which i have is that it consumes a lot of memory
Post a Comment